Are Contracts Valid during Coronavirus

Most employers require workers` compensation insurance; either expressly by law or implicitly by commercial contracts. Occupational accident insurance generally covers accidents on the construction site, as well as occupational diseases characteristic of a trade, profession or job. Characteristic occupational diseases include, for example, asbestosis and mesothelioma for those who have worked with asbestos and black lung diseases for underground miners. Issues to consider in the context of commercial contracts in order to survive Covid-19 restrictions and plan for the future. The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic – as well as government orders to contain it – has prevented countless people, from babysitters to basketball players, from fulfilling their contracts. Are all of these parties legally responsible for violating their contracts? Or are they excused for this extraordinary event? What about upfront payments, such as tickets purchased for a concert that has now been cancelled or a dormitory rented at a college that is now closed? First, if a period of time to fulfil the obligation is an essential part of the contract (by contractual provision or by the nature of the transaction), the expiry of the period means that the contract is terminated on the basis of the law. The creditor may (but is not obliged) to keep the contract in force if the creditor immediately informs the debtor after the expiry that he is requesting performance of the contract. If the obligation is not fulfilled even within a new reasonable time, the creditor may terminate the contract. If the period of performance of the obligation is not an essential part of the contract, the creditor may request it and the debtor has the right to perform its obligation even after the expiry of the period. However, if the creditor wishes to terminate the contract after the expiry of the period, it must grant the debtor a reasonable grace period for performance. Since there is no definition of a reasonable or reasonable period of time, these time limits constitute legal standards that are interpreted according to the specific circumstances of each individual situation. In the event of liability for damage suffered by the creditor as a result of the delay or late performance of contractual obligations, the debtor may be relieved of liability for damages only if he proves that he has not fulfilled his obligations due to circumstances that he could not prevent or that he was in default. to be eliminated or avoided after the conclusion of the contract.

In this respect, the circumstances arising from the pandemic/outbreak of the novel coronavirus can in principle be considered a case of force majeure, but this can be proved in each individual case, i.e. the pandemic itself does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the debtor has not been able to properly fulfil its obligations. 2. I entered into a contract before the outbreak of an epidemic, my situation has deteriorated considerably and the contract is very detrimental to me because I cannot deliver the contractually agreed deliveries on time. How could I deal with the situation – is it possible to renegotiate the terms of the contract? In this situation, it may be possible to apply the change of circumstances clause (rebus sic stantibus). Serbian contract law provides that if, after the conclusion of the contract, the following circumstances occur: – which make it difficult for one of the parties to perform the obligation, or – the subject matter of the contract cannot therefore be achieved, and in both cases it is obvious that: – the contract no longer meets the expectations of the contracting parties, and – in general, it would be unfair to maintain them in their current form, the party who has difficulties in fulfilling his obligations or who cannot fulfill the subject of the contract may request the termination of the contact. However, a contracting party does not have this right if – it was obliged to take these circumstances into account at the time of the conclusion of the contract (an epidemic is by its very nature not covered by the obligation to be taken into account, but we believe that there may also be exceptions – namely the question arises as to whether the party which concluded the contract before an epidemic was declared in its territory, but after the epidemic began to spread from China, he was forced to take it into account, etc.), – The circumstances could have been avoided or overcome, or – If the circumstances occurred after the expiry of the deadline to fulfill the obligation. It is important to note that the other party has the authority to maintain the contract in force by offering the relevant terms of the contract or by accepting a change. In this respect, the new situation, provided that the above conditions are met, offers the possibility of addressing the issue of treaty amendment. In the absence of the consent of the parties, the court will decide on the termination or modification of the contract, taking into account certain legal circumstances. 3. I have entered into a contract but I am not able to fully fulfil my obligations due to the epidemic; For example, I can only deliver a limited amount of goods.

Will the treaty continue to exist? What should I do if the contractually agreed service is not completely impossible, but very difficult? It is therefore not surprising that courts often reject claims of force majeure and rarely conclude that a party should be released from the contract on this basis. 39 Open this footnote Close this footnote 39 See, for example, id. to 296 („[C]ontractual force majeure clauses. Give a close defense. »); New York Practice Series: Commercial Litigation in New York State Courts § 114:36 (Robert L. Haig ed., 4th ed. 2019) (indicate that the force majeure clause is „rarely successfully invoked”); Harold Alexander Lewis, Commentary, Allocation Risk in Take-or-Pay Contracts: Are Force Majeure and Commercial Impracticability the Same Defense?, 42 b.w.

© 2020 Elite English Academy. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone.